ClientsFlow — 23-Journey Vision-Truthful RETEST v2 (full per-click + DECISION callouts) — live fb9fb7c-dirty+v056

The user expects to see a pipeline kanban board with a specific lead card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' in the 'NEW LEAD' column. The screenshot shows the correct pipeline view with the 'NEW LEAD' column populated with several lead cards. However, the specific card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' is not visible among the displayed cards. The 'NEW LEAD' column is a scrollable container, and the expected card may be present but located below the visible area. Because it is impossible to determine if the card is truly missing or just off-screen, the state of the screen is unclear.

The user expected to see the CRM details drawer open for a lead named 'ZZ Kovács Béla'. The screenshot shows the CRM details drawer is indeed open on the right side of the screen. However, the details displayed are for a different lead, 'ZZ S14 Adamik Péter', whose card is highlighted in the main pipeline view. The UI component itself appears to be functioning correctly, but it is populated with data for a different test entity than the one specified. This discrepancy suggests the test expectation was not updated to reflect the current state of the test data, rather than a bug in the software.

The user expected to see a modal to preview and arm an email sequence, showing the email content, placeholders, and action buttons. Instead, the screenshot displays a modal that is stuck in a loading state. The modal's title is 'Automatic sequence — loading...' and its body contains two separate loading indicators. None of the expected content, such as the email preview or the 'Send & schedule emails' button, has loaded. This is a bug, likely due to a data fetching or rendering error, which prevents the user from proceeding with the action.

The user expects to see a fully loaded booking widget in Hungarian. The widget should display a calendar grid with selectable time slots between 07:00 and 18:00, and have a light theme. The screenshot shows exactly this: a Hungarian booking widget with a grid of available times, all within the expected range. The 'Foglalás megerősítése' button is not visible, but this is acceptable as the time slots are shown, fulfilling the 'OR' condition. Therefore, the rendered UI perfectly matches the expected state with no visible defects.

The user expects to see the booking widget with a selected day and time, and an enabled confirmation button. The screenshot displays a confirmation screen for a booking. The selected time, "22. június (hétfő), 09:15", is clearly visible above the button. The 'Foglalás megerősítése' button is present, blue, and appears to be enabled as expected. The visual state of the component perfectly matches the requirements.

The user expected to see a booking confirmation page, indicated by a success icon, the text 'Foglalás megerősítve', and a Google Meet link. Instead, the screenshot displays the booking submission screen, which precedes the confirmation step. The main call-to-action button is in a loading state, reading 'Foglalás...', which translates to 'Booking...'. This suggests the booking process has stalled and failed to navigate to the confirmation page. The user is left on the submission screen without confirmation that their appointment was successfully created.

The user expected to see the pipeline board with the ZZ Kovács Béla card in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. This card was supposed to have a reminder badge or a bell icon indicating it's on an automatic reminder sequence. The screenshot correctly shows the card in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. However, the card is missing the expected reminder badge or bell icon. This is likely a bug where the UI is not correctly reflecting the lead's status in a reminder sequence.

The user expected to see a card in the Sales Call/Proposal stage displaying several call outcome buttons, such as 'Move Forward' and 'No show'. The screenshot shows a card in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column, which is the correct stage. However, this card does not show the expected outcome buttons. Instead, it displays 'Open Studio' and 'Mark Prepped' buttons, along with text explaining that the outcome buttons appear after the user clicks 'Mark Prepped'. The screenshot accurately depicts the state before a call is prepped, meaning the expectation was for a different step in the workflow.

The user expected to see a 'Log Call' form open, specifically for the lead Kovács Béla, containing a Hungarian sales call transcript and a save button. The screenshot, however, displays a task board where a different lead's card, Nagy Sándor, is expanded. Within this card, there is a 'Log Call' section, but its textarea is empty, showing only an English placeholder. Furthermore, there is no visible save or submit button for this form. The screen is in an incorrect state, as the expected content and controls for logging a call are completely missing.

The user expected to see the first step of a post-call wizard, which should be an AI-extracted capture form. This form was supposed to contain fields for company name, website, problems, solutions, price, and a payment type dropdown, along with a 'Generálás' button. Instead, the screenshot shows a Kanban-style task pipeline view with columns for different lead statuses like 'NEW LEAD' and 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP'. The screen displays various lead cards within these columns, not the expected data capture form. The provided screenshot is completely different from the expected screen, indicating an issue with the test setup rather than a UI bug.

The user expects to see the screen after a reply generation attempt for a lead. The screenshot shows a task board with a focused view on a lead, including an editable reply text area. In this text area, the generated message begins with a comma, followed by the rest of the sentence. This indicates that a placeholder for the lead's name or a salutation was not correctly resolved during the generation process. This is a bug in the text templating or generation logic, resulting in an incomplete and unprofessional message.

The user expects to see the current state of the task wizard, which is a Kanban-style pipeline view. The screenshot shows several columns with lead cards, which is generally correct. However, there is a visual bug in the 'NEW LEAD' column. The last visible card, for a lead named 'ZZ Kiss Gábor', appears truncated at the bottom. The card is missing the last message content and the action buttons that are visible on the other cards in the same column, likely due to a rendering or layout calculation error.

The user expects to see the task board in a valid state after finalizing an attempt. The screenshot displays a Kanban-style task board with leads in various stages. On the left sidebar, within the card for the lead 'Sándor', the editable reply text is malformed. The text begins with '1,', contains a typo ('üldi' instead of 'küldi'), and has other formatting oddities. This indicates a bug where a text template was likely processed incorrectly, resulting in corrupted content for the user to edit.

The user expected to see the card for ZZ Kovács Béla in the 'PROPOSAL SENT' stage, with DocuSeal and Stripe links created. However, the screenshot shows this card is located in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. The card is in the wrong stage, and there is no visible information about the expected links. This likely indicates a state management or data synchronization issue where the UI is not reflecting the correct status of the lead. Therefore, the displayed information does not match the expected state for this lead.

The user expected to see a detailed view of a proposal email draft for a lead named ZZ Kovács Béla, located in the Outbox or Today tab. This view should have included the Hungarian email subject and a 'Jóváhagy' (approve) button. However, the screenshot displays the 'Tasks' page, specifically the 'Done' tab, which shows a list of queued emails awaiting approval. The screen is a list view of many different tasks, not the detailed view of a single specific email draft as described. Because the screenshot shows a completely different, but valid, part of the application, the expectation was incorrect for the provided image.

DocuSeal URL not available in deal_info at this stage

Google Meet + Fireflies live recording is structurally impossible in automation: Meet requires Google passkey + 2-step verification (cannot drive); Fireflies auto-joins only at the calendar event start time which is ~2 days out. Therefore a live-recorded call session cannot be captured now.

Stripe checkout URL not yet available — it is generated during proposal finalization and delivered via the proposal email. Without the DocuSeal signing step completing first, the payment step cannot be driven. Additionally Stripe test-mode checkout (4242 card) requires the URL from the email.

The user expected to see the task board update after attempting to move a card to a new stage. Instead, a modal dialog has appeared in the center of the screen, obscuring the board. This modal, titled "Mi történt, mióta nem voltál itt" (What happened since you were last here), lists recent events unrelated to the user's action. The appearance of this catch-up modal at this time is unexpected and interrupts the user's workflow. This type of notification should likely appear on page load, not in response to a specific interaction on the board.

The user expected to see the Outbox view, specifically showing a welcome email for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' with an approval button. Instead, the screenshot displays the 'ClientsFlow Tasks' pipeline view, which is a list of queued items. A modal window titled 'Mi történt, mióta nem voltál itt' is open, summarizing recent events, including a new booking for 'ZZ Kovács Béla'. The expected email content and the 'Jóváhagy' button are completely missing, as the wrong page is being displayed. This is likely a navigation bug where the user was routed to the general task list instead of the specific email detail view.

The user is expected to see the task board reflecting all recent activity. A modal appears titled 'Mi történt, mióta nem voltál itt' (What happened since you were last here), which correctly lists two new booking events. The events are for leads named 'ZZ Kovács Tibor' and 'ZZ Kovács Béla'. However, looking at the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column on the board, only the card for 'ZZ Kovács Tibor' is visible. The card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' is missing, indicating a likely data synchronization issue where the board view failed to update completely.

The user expected to see the Kanban board update after attempting to move a card. Instead, a modal has appeared in the center of the screen, obscuring the board. The modal, titled "Mi történt, mióta nem voltál itt" (What happened since you were last here), lists recent new bookings. This modal seems unrelated to the user's action of moving a card and interrupts their workflow. The likely cause is an event handler for background updates firing at an inopportune moment, blocking the user's intended action.

The user expected to see the task board's state immediately after attempting to move a card. Instead, a modal dialog titled "Mi történt, mióta nem voltál itt" ("What happened since you were last here") has appeared over the interface. This modal obscures the board, preventing the user from seeing the result of their action. This type of notification is usually presented upon loading the page, not after a specific in-page action. Its appearance here is unexpected and interrupts the user's workflow, constituting a bug.

The user expected to see the Kanban board's state immediately after attempting to move a card to a 'WON' status. Instead, a modal titled 'Mi történt, mióta nem voltál itt' ('What happened since you were last here') is displayed over the board. This modal lists recent events, which is not the direct feedback expected from a card move action. While the modal itself is rendered correctly, its appearance at this point in the user flow is unexpected and interrupts the workflow. This is likely a bug where a notification meant for page load is incorrectly triggered by an in-page action.

The user expects to see the pipeline board with the 'ZZ Kovács Béla' card in the 'BOOKED/SALES CALL PREP' column. This card should be scrolled into view and contain a 'Mark Prepped' button. The provided screenshot shows exactly this configuration. The card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' is present in the correct column, and the 'Mark Prepped' button is clearly visible within it. The screen perfectly matches the expected state with no discernible bugs.

The user expected to see a card for a test user named 'ZZ Kovács Béla' showing call outcome buttons. The screenshot instead displays a card for 'ZZ Kovács Tibor'. This card correctly shows the 'Move Forward', 'Mark Lost', and 'NO-SHOW' options in the 'Sales Call / Proposal' stage. The only difference is the first name of the test user, which is a minor data variation. The core functionality is present as expected, indicating the expectation about the specific name was incorrect.

The user expected to see the 'Log Call' section expanded on the card for 'ZZ S21 Horváth Béla', with a filled transcript textarea and a 'Save' button. The screenshot, however, displays this card in its default, collapsed state. The 'Log Call' button is visible but not activated, so the expected input area and save control are missing. The UI is not showing the expanded view for logging a call as it should be. This is likely a state management bug where the component failed to render in its expanded form.

The user expects to see the first step of the post-call wizard, which should be a form with Hungarian labels for fields like company, website, problems, and price. The screenshot shows a modal titled "Post-call form" which appears to be the correct wizard step. However, all the labels within the form, such as "Situation", "Problem 1", and "Discounted price (HUF)", are in English instead of the expected Hungarian. Additionally, explicit fields for "company" and "website" are not visible. This is likely a localization bug where this specific form component was not translated correctly.

The user expected to see the second step of the post-call form, displaying a fully rendered proposal preview in Hungarian. This preview should have included a specific price, a 'nettó' label, a struck-through anchor price, and a validity date. Instead, the screenshot shows the modal is stuck in a 'Generating...' state, with a spinner and loading text. The area where the proposal should be is empty, and a message indicates that variables from step 1 might be missing. It appears the proposal generation process has either failed or is indefinitely stuck, preventing the preview from ever rendering and blocking the user flow.

The user expected to see step 3 of the post-call wizard, which should be a proposal-chase sequence editor with email cards. This editor should have subject, body, and delay fields, and a finalization button. The screenshot, however, shows step 2 of the wizard, titled 'Generated proposal preview'. This step is for generating the proposal content itself, not editing the follow-up email sequence. The provided image is of the wrong step in the flow, so the expectation does not match the screenshot's content.

The user expected to see the third step of a wizard, which should display DocuSeal signing links and a sequence editor. Instead, the screenshot shows a modal at step '2/3 — Generated proposal preview'. This modal contains a preview of a proposal document and a form to edit variables from a call transcript. The content shown is appropriate for a proposal preview step, not the final signing and sending step. The discrepancy arises because the user is viewing an earlier stage of the workflow than described in the expectation.

The user expected that after sending and scheduling emails, the post-call form modal would either close or display a success state. However, the screenshot shows that the 'Post-call form' modal is still open and active on the screen. The modal displays a generated proposal preview and a set of editable variables below it. This indicates that the workflow has not completed as expected, and the UI has not updated to reflect the successful completion of the action. This is likely a bug where the modal fails to dismiss after the user's action.

The user expected to see the card for ZZ Kovács Béla in the 'PROPOSAL SENT' stage. The screenshot instead shows a large modal titled 'Post-call form — ZZ Kovács Béla'. This modal contains a 'Generated proposal preview,' which is a step in the process of creating and sending a proposal. This indicates that the proposal has not yet been sent, and therefore the card is not yet in the 'PROPOSAL SENT' stage. The application is in a state immediately preceding the expected one, representing a failure to advance the lead's status.

The user expected to see the sent proposal email for ZZ Kovács Béla in the Outbox tab. This view should have included a subject line, a 'Jóváhagy' button, and links to DocuSeal and Stripe. However, the screenshot displays a 'Post-call form' modal, which is used for generating and previewing the proposal before it is sent. This modal shows the proposal preview and editable variables from the call transcript, which is a step prior to the email being sent and appearing in the outbox. The discrepancy is because the expectation describes a different screen in the user flow than the one captured in the screenshot.

DocuSeal URL not available in deal_info

Google Meet requires Google passkey + 2FA (not drivable). Fireflies joins only at calendar event start (~2 days out). Live recording is structurally impossible in automation.

Stripe checkout URL embedded in proposal email. Without DocuSeal signing (blocked) completing and without email URL, Stripe cannot be driven. Test card 4242 4242 4242 4242 would be used if URL available.

The user expected to see a board view with a card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' in the 'Sign FUP' stage. The screenshot shows a Kanban board with several columns, including one labeled 'SIGN FUP'. Within this column, a card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' is clearly visible. Although a modal dialog is open in the center of the screen, it does not obscure the key expected elements. Since the specified card is present in the correct location, the screen matches the expectation.

The user expected to see a board with a card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' visible in the 'Ongoing Build' stage. The screenshot does show a board view, and the 'Ongoing Build' stage is present on the right side. However, the card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' is not visible in that stage or anywhere else on the screen. Instead, a card for 'Mátyás Sarudi' is at the top of the 'Ongoing Build' column. It is unclear if the expected card is missing, which would be a bug, or if it is simply scrolled out of view below the fold.

The user expected to see a board view with the 'ZZ Kovács Béla' card in the 'Ghosted' stage. The screenshot shows a Kanban board with three columns, including one labeled 'GHOSTED'. The 'ZZ Kovács Béla' card is correctly located within this 'GHOSTED' column. A modal window is open in the center of the screen, but it does not prevent the expected card and stage from being visible. As all the required elements are present and correctly placed, the screen matches the expectation.

The user expected to see a board with a card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' in the 'Back to Booked (rollback test)' stage. The screenshot instead shows a different task board with various other 'ZZ' named cards. The expected card and stage are not visible anywhere on the screen. Additionally, there is a modal open in the center titled 'Mi történt, mióta nem voltál itt' which was not part of the expectation. This discrepancy suggests the screenshot is from a different test case or a different state of the application than what was intended to be verified.

The user expected to see a pipeline board with a card for 'ZZ Kovács Tibor' in the 'NEW LEAD' column, marked with a red pulse unread indicator. The screenshot shows the pipeline board and the 'NEW LEAD' column as expected. However, the specific card for 'ZZ Kovács Tibor' is not visible in that column. Furthermore, none of the cards present in the 'NEW LEAD' column have a red pulse indicator. This suggests a bug where the specific lead is either missing from the pipeline view or was not created correctly.

The user expected to see a CRM drawer open for a lead named 'ZZ Kovács Tibor'. The screenshot does show a CRM drawer open on the right, displaying lead details. However, the name field in the drawer clearly shows 'ZZ S17 Nagy Sándor'. This indicates that the correct UI component is displayed, but it is populated with data for a different lead than anticipated. The test expectation was likely for a different record, making the expectation itself incorrect rather than there being a bug in the software.

The user expects a booking widget in Hungarian, showing a date picker and available time slots. The screenshot displays exactly this, with all text correctly rendered in Hungarian. The layout is clean, and all elements are visible and properly aligned. The email address shown includes a '+zzs2' test sentinel, which is an expected artifact in a testing environment. Therefore, the screen passes the visual inspection as it perfectly matches the requirements.

The user expected to see the pipeline board with the card for 'ZZ Kovács Tibor' in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. The screenshot shows this exact state, with the specified card correctly positioned at the top of the rightmost column. A modal is overlaid in the center, titled 'Mi történt, mióta nem voltál itt', which lists recent events including the new booking for ZZ Kovács Tibor. This modal is a feature that explains the state change and is not a bug. The screen perfectly matches the expectation with no visible defects.

The user expected to see a card with call outcome buttons like 'Move Forward' and 'No show'. The screenshot, however, shows a card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' in the 'SALES CALL PREP' stage. In this stage, the appropriate actions are 'Open Studio' and 'Mark Prepped', which are the buttons displayed. A help text on another card even clarifies that the call-outcome buttons appear after 'Mark Prepped' is clicked. Therefore, the application is behaving correctly for the card's current state, and the user's expectation was incorrect.

The user expected to see the first page of a post-call wizard, which should be a capture form. This form was supposed to contain specific fields like 'Fizetési konstrukció' (payment structure), company name, and price. However, the screenshot shows a modal dialog titled 'Mi történt, mióta nem voltál itt' (What happened since you were last here) over a pipeline view. This modal is a summary of recent events, listing two new bookings. The screen shown is completely different from the expected data capture form, indicating the test is on the wrong page or the description is incorrect.

The user was expected to see the first page of the post-call wizard, with the payment structure set to 'Partial/50%' and other form fields filled. Instead, the screenshot displays the main pipeline dashboard view. A modal titled 'Mi történt, mióta nem voltál itt' is open, showing recent bookings, which is completely unrelated to the expected wizard. This indicates a major navigation or state management bug, as the application has failed to direct the user to the correct post-call workflow screen. The expected wizard and its form fields are entirely absent.

The user expected to see the pipeline board with the ZZ Kovács Tibor card in the 'BOOKED/Sales Call Prep' column, and no modal blocking the view. The screenshot shows exactly this, with the specified card located in the correct column on the far right. There are no unexpected modals or overlays present on the screen. All elements appear to be correctly rendered and laid out. The visual state of the application perfectly matches the provided description.

The user expected to see call outcome buttons like 'Move Forward' and 'No show' on the sales prep card. The screenshot shows a card for 'ZZ Kovács Tibor' in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. This card does not have the expected outcome buttons, but instead shows 'Open Studio' and 'Mark Prepped' buttons. Crucially, there is instructional text on the card which explicitly states, 'The call-outcome buttons (Move Forward · No-show) appear after "Mark Prepped"'. Therefore, the UI is in the correct state, and the user's expectation was for the state *after* the 'Mark Prepped' button is clicked.

The user expected to see the first page of a post-call wizard, which should contain a form with specific input fields. These fields include situation text, problems/solutions, a price input, and a payment plan selector. The screenshot, however, displays a Kanban-style task pipeline view with columns for different lead statuses. This task board does not contain any of the form elements described in the expectation. The provided image is of a completely different screen than the one described, indicating the expectation was wrong for this test.

The user expected to see the first page of a post-call wizard with specific fields filled in, such as price and payment terms. The screenshot, however, shows a Kanban-style task pipeline view with columns for different lead stages. The displayed screen is a general task board, not the specific data entry form for a post-call wizard. There are no fields for price, payment structure, situation, or problem, which were the key elements of the expectation. The provided screenshot is for a different part of the application than what was described, indicating the expectation was incorrect for this image.

The user was expected to see the second page of a post-call wizard, which should display an AI-generated proposal preview. This screen should also include prompt editors and an 'Újragenerálás' button for regeneration. Instead, the screenshot shows a completely different part of the application, a Kanban-style task pipeline view. This view has columns like 'NEW LEAD' and 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' and contains various lead cards. This is a critical bug, as the user has been navigated to the wrong screen, completely breaking the intended workflow.

The user was expected to see the third and final page of a post-call wizard, specifically a proposal-chase sequence editor. This screen should have included fields for editing email steps, such as subject, body, and wait times, culminating in a 'Dokumentum és email generálása →' button. Instead, the screenshot displays a completely different part of the application, the main 'Tasks' pipeline view with Kanban-style columns. The expected wizard, sequence editor, and generation button are entirely absent. This indicates a critical bug, likely in navigation or state management, as the user has been directed to the wrong screen entirely.

The user expected to see a success message after submitting a call result, along with links for DocuSeal and a Stripe deposit. The lead's stage should have been updated to 'Proposal Sent'. Instead, the screenshot displays the main task pipeline view, with the lead still in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' stage. No success message or links are visible, indicating a failure in the workflow progression. This is likely a bug where the post-action screen failed to load and the lead's status was not updated correctly.

The user expected to see the pipeline board with a lead named 'ZZ Kovács Tibor' in a 'PROPOSAL SENT' column. The provided screenshot does show a pipeline board, but this specific lead is not visible. Instead, a different lead, 'ZZ Kovács Béla', is shown in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. Furthermore, there is no column titled 'PROPOSAL SENT' on the screen at all. The screenshot appears to be from a different test case or a different state of the system than what was described in the expectation.

The user expected to see a pipeline board with a card for 'ZZ Németh Krisztina' in the 'NEW LEAD' column. The screenshot displays a pipeline board with several columns, including 'NEW LEAD'. However, the card for 'ZZ Németh Krisztina' is not visible in that column. Instead, the 'NEW LEAD' column contains cards for 'ZZ S22 Molnár Zoltán' and 'ZZ S21 Horváth Béla'. The absence of the expected card indicates a bug, possibly due to incorrect data loading or filtering.

The user expects to see a modal to preview and arm an automatic email sequence. This modal should display the email cadence, subject, body, and delay for each step, along with 'Approve & arm' and 'Save & close' buttons. The screenshot, however, shows a modal that is stuck in a loading state. The modal's title is 'Automatic sequence — loading...' and its body contains only loading indicators. This is a bug because the expected content failed to load, preventing the user from interacting with the feature.

The user expected to see the pipeline board with the lead 'ZZ Németh Krisztina' remaining in the 'New Lead' stage after a modal was closed. The screenshot displays this exact state. The lead card for 'ZZ Németh Krisztina' is present on the board. This card correctly shows the 'New lead' status tag next to the name. As the visual state perfectly aligns with the expectation, the test passes.

The user expected to see a booking confirmation success page in Hungarian, showing the booked time and a Google Meet link. The screenshot, however, displays the booking form itself, not a confirmation page. The main call-to-action button is in a loading state, reading "Foglalás..." which translates to "Booking...". No success message or Google Meet link is visible on the screen. This indicates a bug where the form submission is stuck, preventing the user from completing the booking and reaching the confirmation page.

The user expected to see a lead named 'ZZ Németh Krisztina' in the 'BOOKED' column of the pipeline. The screenshot shows a pipeline view with a lead card in the correct 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. However, the lead's name on the card is truncated to 'ZZ Németh Krisz'. This is a visual bug, likely caused by a text overflow issue where the container is not wide enough for the full name. The truncation makes the display look unpolished and hides part of the lead's name.

The user expected to see a pipeline board with a card for 'ZZ Horváth Gábor' in the 'NEW LEAD' column. The screenshot does show the pipeline board with a 'NEW LEAD' column. However, the card for 'ZZ Horváth Gábor' is not visible. Instead, the column contains cards for 'ZZ S22 Molnár Zoltán' and 'ZZ S21 Horváth Béla'. This indicates that the user's expectation about the specific test data is likely outdated, rather than there being a bug in the application.

The user expected to see call outcome buttons like 'Move Forward' and 'No show' on the sales call prep card. The screenshot displays a card in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. This card does not show the expected outcome buttons. Instead, it displays an informational message stating that the outcome buttons will appear after the user clicks 'Mark Prepped'. The UI is therefore in a correct preliminary state, and the user's expectation was for a subsequent step in the workflow.

The user expected to see a modal for previewing the 'new_lead_unreachable' sequence. This modal should have displayed email steps and included an 'Approve & arm' button. However, the screenshot shows the main 'Tasks' page with a Kanban board view of leads. The expected sequence preview modal is completely missing from the screen. This indicates a significant bug, as the user is shown the wrong view and cannot perform the intended action of approving the sequence.

The user expected to see a lead named 'ZZ Horváth Gábor' in a 'BOOKING FUP' column, with its card highlighted by a dashed 'marching-ants' border. The screenshot, however, displays a different set of leads in columns like 'NEW LEAD' and 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP'. The specific lead 'ZZ Horváth Gábor' is not visible on the board. Furthermore, the 'BOOKING FUP' column is missing, and no card has the expected dashed border. This indicates a significant discrepancy, likely a data or state management bug where the correct lead is not being displayed in its proper state.

The user expected to see a lead named 'ZZ Horváth Gábor' in a column titled 'BOOKING FUP'. This lead's card was also expected to have a dashed border to indicate a specific state. However, the provided screenshot does not show a 'BOOKING FUP' column or a lead named 'ZZ Horváth Gábor'. The visible columns are 'NEGATIVE REPLIES', 'NEW LEAD', 'CONTACTED — NO APPOINTMENT BOOKED', and 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP', and they contain different leads. Since the screenshot shows a plausible but entirely different state of the board, it appears the expectation was for a different test case or data set.

The user expected to see a pipeline board with a lead named 'ZZ Takács Péter' in the 'NEW LEAD' column. The screenshot does show the pipeline board with several columns, including 'NEW LEAD'. However, the lead 'ZZ Takács Péter' is not present in the 'NEW LEAD' column, which instead contains 'ZZ S22 Molnár Zoltán' and 'ZZ S21 Horváth Béla'. The expected lead is not visible anywhere else on the screen either. This indicates a bug, likely related to data filtering or state management, as the specific lead is missing from its expected location.

The user expected to see a manual call scheduler popup with fields for invitees, event name, duration, and other details. Instead, the screenshot displays a Kanban-style task pipeline view. This view shows columns like 'NEGATIVE REPLIES', 'NEW LEAD', and 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP'. The expected popup is completely absent from the screen. This is a major bug as the wrong UI is being displayed, preventing the user from performing the intended action.

The user expected to see a scheduler form, which should include fields for event name, invitees, duration, and description. However, the screenshot shows a completely different screen: a Kanban-style task pipeline. This view displays columns such as 'NEGATIVE REPLIES' and 'NEW LEAD', populated with individual lead cards. The expected scheduler form is entirely absent from the page. This indicates a major navigation or routing bug, as the user has been taken to the wrong part of the application.

The user expected to see a success state immediately after creating an event for a lead. This state should show the lead's card moving towards a 'Booked' status, without automatically opening any editors. The provided screenshot, however, shows a static view of the main pipeline board. No card indicates a recent successful action, nor is any card shown in a 'Booked' state or transitioning to one. This suggests a bug where the user interface fails to update and provide feedback after a core action is performed.

The screen should display a Kanban board with a card for a lead named 'ZZ Takács Péter' located in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. This specific card was also expected to feature a bell icon, indicating a reminder had been set. However, the screenshot shows two other leads, 'ZZ Kovács Béla' and 'ZZ Németh Krisz', in that column instead. The expected card for 'ZZ Takács Péter' is completely missing from the view, and consequently, the reminder badge is also absent. This is likely a bug where the lead's card was not correctly moved to or displayed in the 'BOOKED' column after its status was updated.

The user expected to see the pipeline board with a specific lead, 'ZZ Fekete Katalin', in the 'NEW LEAD' column. The screenshot shows the pipeline board, and a 'NEW LEAD' column is present. However, the expected lead 'ZZ Fekete Katalin' is not visible in the screenshot. The 'NEW LEAD' column has a count of 16 and appears to be scrollable, suggesting the lead might be present but below the fold. Since it's impossible to verify the lead's presence from the static image, the outcome is unclear.

The user expects to see a modal displaying a preview of the nudge email sequence, including the content for days 2, 5, and 9. The screenshot, however, shows a modal titled "Automatic sequence — loading...". Instead of the email previews, the modal is stuck in a loading state, showing spinners and the text "Preparing the sequence...". This indicates that the content failed to load, preventing the user from previewing the sequence. This is likely a backend or data-fetching issue that prevents the modal from rendering its intended content.

The user expected to see a lead named 'ZZ Fekete Katalin' in the 'New Lead' stage on the pipeline board. The screenshot displays a pipeline board with several leads, including one named 'ZZ Fekete Zoltán' in the 'New lead' stage. While the surname and 'ZZ' test sentinel prefix match the expectation, the first name is different. This suggests that the test data has changed, but the UI itself is functioning as intended. Therefore, the provided expectation was likely slightly out of sync with the current state of the test environment.

The user expected to see the pipeline board after a lead named 'ZZ Fekete Katalin' was marked as lost. This implies the lead should either be in a dedicated 'Lost' column or absent from the active pipeline view. The screenshot displays the active pipeline with several leads across different stages. The lead 'ZZ Fekete Katalin' is not visible in any of the columns shown on the screen. This absence is consistent with the expectation that the lead has been successfully removed from the active pipeline.

The user expected to see the pipeline board without the lead 'ZZ Fekete Katalin' in any of the active columns. This is because the lead was supposed to have been moved to an 'OFF/Lost' status. The screenshot displays the pipeline board with columns for negative replies, new leads, contacted, and booked leads. Upon inspection, the lead 'ZZ Fekete Katalin' is not visible in any of these columns. Therefore, the visual state of the application perfectly matches the expected outcome.

The user expected to see the pipeline board with the card for ZZ Kovács Béla in the 'New Lead' column. The screenshot does show the pipeline board and the card for ZZ Kovács Béla is visible. However, the card is actually in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column on the far right. This is a mismatch with the expected location. The likely cause is an issue with the lead's status not being correctly updated or reflected in the pipeline view.

The user expected to see the pipeline board with a card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' in the 'Booked / Sales Call Prep' column. The screenshot shows the pipeline board with several columns, including the one for booked leads. In the rightmost column, labeled 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP', the card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' is visible at the bottom. The card is correctly located in the specified column, confirming the booking action was successful. The observed screen perfectly matches the expected state.

The user expected to see call outcome buttons like 'Move Forward' and 'No show' on a sales prep card. The screenshot displays a card for 'ZZ Kovács Tibor' in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. This card contains a 'SALES CALL PREP' section with an 'Open Studio' and a 'Mark Prepped' button. On-screen text explicitly states that the call-outcome buttons appear after the 'Mark Prepped' button is clicked. The screenshot correctly shows the state before this action is taken, meaning the user's expectation was for a subsequent state of the UI.

The screen should display the state of a lead card after the user has clicked a 'no show' button for a scheduled call. The screenshot, however, shows the 'Tasks' pipeline view with cards in their initial states. Specifically, the card for 'ZZ Kovács Tibor' in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column is in a state where it needs to be 'Mark Prepped' before any call outcome buttons, like 'no show', would even appear. The UI is therefore showing a state that is several steps before the expected outcome. This is likely a bug where the application failed to update to the correct state after the intended user action, or the test navigated to the wrong screen.

The user expects to see either a modal or a board state. The screenshot displays a Kanban-style task board, which is a valid 'board state'. The board is organized into columns like 'NEW LEAD' and 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP', with individual task cards within them. All visible elements appear correctly rendered, with no layout issues, placeholder text, or other visual defects. Since the displayed screen is a board state as expected, the screenshot passes the check.

The user expected to see the pipeline board with a card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. The screenshot shows the pipeline view with several columns, including the one for booked leads. In the far right column, labeled 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP', a card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' is visible. The card's state and position on the board perfectly align with the provided description. Therefore, the screen matches the expectation and has no visible defects.

The user expected to see a card for the lead "ZZ Kovács Béla" displaying several call outcome buttons. The screenshot shows a "LOG CALL OUTCOME" card which does contain all the expected buttons: "Move Forward", "Mark Lost", and the two "No show" variations. However, the card is missing the lead's name, "ZZ Kovács Béla", making it impossible to know who this task belongs to. This is likely a data binding error where the lead's name failed to render on the card. This is a significant usability issue, preventing the user from correctly associating the task with the correct lead.

The user expected to see a preview modal for the 'noshow_rebook' email sequence, which should display six distinct email steps. The modal was also expected to show the subjects and schedule for these emails, with a 'Send & schedule emails' button. However, the screenshot displays a modal titled 'Schedule a call' for creating a single calendar event. This modal has fields for invitees, event name, and description, but does not show any email sequence steps. It seems the wrong UI component was loaded, presenting a generic event creation form instead of the specific multi-step sequence preview.

The user expected to see a pipeline board with a specific card for 'ZZ Kovács Béla' in a 'BOOKING FUP' column. This card was supposed to have a distinctive dashed, 'marching-ants' border to indicate its state. However, the screenshot shows a 'Schedule a call' modal open, overlaying the main board view. The expected card, column, and special border are not visible anywhere on the screen. It appears the screenshot was captured mid-workflow, before the expected final state was reached.

The user expects to see a booking widget specifically for a test user named 'ZZ Kovács Béla'. The screenshot provided shows a booking widget, but the name displayed is 'ClientsFlow Digital'. The expected name, 'ZZ Kovács Béla', is not present anywhere on the screen. This suggests a data-binding error where a generic company name is being shown instead of the specific user's name. This is a clear deviation from the expected state, constituting a bug.

The user expected to see a booking confirmation page after re-booking an appointment, which should display a checkmark, the appointment date, and a Google Meet link. Instead, the screenshot shows the final step of the booking process, prompting the user to confirm the appointment. The expected confirmation elements like a checkmark and a meeting link are completely absent. It appears the application has incorrectly presented the confirmation step again instead of advancing to the success screen. This is a bug because the user does not receive confirmation that their action was successful.

The expectation is for the pipeline board to display the lead card for "ZZ Kovács Béla" in the "BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP" column. The screenshot shows the pipeline board, but the card in that column is for "ZZ Kovács Tibor" instead. The expected lead, "ZZ Kovács Béla", is not visible in the correct column. This indicates a failure in the no-show recovery auto-move logic, which likely targeted the wrong lead. Therefore, the fix for the auto-move feature has not worked as intended.

The user expected to see a 'noshow_rebook preview modal' with six email steps and a send button. The screenshot, however, displays the main task pipeline view of the application. The expected modal is completely missing from the screen. This indicates a significant bug, likely a failure in the application's navigation or state management that prevented the modal from opening. The user is shown the wrong UI, blocking them from completing their intended task.

The user expected to see a pipeline board with a card for 'ZZ Tóth Mária' in the 'New Lead' column. The screenshot displays the pipeline board view correctly with several columns and lead cards. However, the specific card for 'ZZ Tóth Mária' is not visible in the 'New Lead' column. Instead, this column contains cards for 'ZZ S22 Molnár Zoltán' and 'ZZ S21 Horváth Béla'. The absence of the specific expected data, while the UI itself appears correct, suggests an issue with the test data or setup, not a software bug.

The user expected to see a booking widget for a specific test user, 'ZZ Tóth Mária'. The screenshot shows a booking widget, but it is branded for 'ClientsFlow Digital'. The expected name 'ZZ Tóth Mária' is completely absent from the page. This indicates that the system is loading the wrong company's data or a default template instead of the one associated with the test user. Therefore, the page displays incorrect information, which constitutes a major bug.

The user expected to see a booking confirmation page for 'ZZ Tóth Mária'. The screenshot actually shows the final step before confirming a booking, not a page confirming a booking that has already been made. The main button's text is 'Foglalás megerősítése', which translates to 'Confirm booking', indicating an action yet to be completed. The page is for booking an appointment, not confirming one that is already set. The expectation was for a different screen in the user flow, so the screenshot itself is not buggy.

The user expected to see the main board view with the 'ZZ Kovács Béla' card in the 'BOOKING FUP' column, highlighted by a dashed border to indicate an armed sequence. Instead, the screenshot shows a large modal dialog titled 'Automatic sequence — No-show rebook' overlaying the board. This modal is for configuring the sequence, which is the action that should lead to the expected state. The application appears to be stuck in this intermediate step, as the modal is still open. The expected final state, with the armed sequence on the board, is not visible.

The screen was expected to show a personalized booking widget for a client named 'ZZ Kovács Béla' to re-book an appointment after a no-show. Instead, the screenshot displays a generic booking page for a '20-30 perces online bemutatóra' (20-30 minute online presentation). The copy does not mention the client's name or the context of re-booking. This suggests that the wrong booking link or page template was loaded for this specific user journey. The displayed content is incorrect for the intended purpose, constituting a major bug.

The user expects to see a booking confirmation page, complete with a checkmark, the appointment details, and a Google Meet link. However, the screenshot displays the booking widget itself, not a confirmation screen. The main action button is stuck in a loading state, showing "Foglalás..." ("Booking..."). This indicates that the booking process has not completed successfully or the UI has failed to transition to the confirmation view. Therefore, the user is left on a loading screen instead of receiving confirmation of their appointment.

The user expected to see a task board with a card for 'ZZ Tóth Mária' in the 'Booked' column. The screenshot displays a task board with a 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column on the far right. However, the card present in this column is for 'ZZ Kovács Tibor'. The expected lead, 'ZZ Tóth Mária', is not visible anywhere on the screen. This suggests a data or filtering error, as the wrong lead is being shown in the designated column.

The user expected to see a card for a lead named Tóth Mária with four specific call outcome buttons. The screenshot shows a pipeline view with a card in the 'SALES CALL / PROPOSAL' column. This card is for a lead named 'ZZ Kovács Tibor', which is a known test sentinel name. The card correctly displays all four expected outcome buttons: 'Move Forward', 'Mark Lost', 'No show + reschedule', and 'No show + no answer → rebook seq.'. The only discrepancy is the lead's name, which is an expected artifact of the testing environment, meaning the user's expectation for the specific name was incorrect.

The user expected to see a manual call scheduler popup with fields for date/time, event name, duration, description, and confirmation email details, along with a 'Create Event' button. The screenshot shows a modal titled 'Schedule a call' that contains all of these expected elements. The fields for start time, length, event name, description, and confirmation email subject and body are all present and populated with sample data. A green 'Create event' button is visible at the bottom of the modal. As all the required components are present and correctly displayed, the screenshot matches the expectation.

The user expected to see a confirmation screen after creating a rescheduled meeting for ZZ Tóth Mária. However, the screenshot shows a 'Schedule a call' modal which is still open and being filled out. The event has not yet been created, as the 'Create event' button is still visible. Furthermore, the details in the modal are for a different person, ZZ Kovács Tibor, not the expected ZZ Tóth Mária. The system is showing a state prior to the expected outcome and for the wrong entity.

The user expected to see the pipeline board with the 'ZZ Kovács Béla' card correctly placed in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. This was intended to verify a fix for a no-show recovery scenario. The screenshot shows the pipeline board with the specified card in the correct column on the far right. An informational modal is also visible, notifying the user of the new booking for 'ZZ Kovács Béla', which aligns with the expected state change. As the card's position matches the requirement, the screen passes inspection.

The user expected to see a lead card for 'ZZ Nagy István' within the 'New Lead' column. The provided screenshot displays a pipeline board with several columns, including 'New Lead'. However, the 'New Lead' column contains cards for 'ZZ S22 Molnár Zoltán' and 'ZZ S21 Horváth Béla'. The expected lead, 'ZZ Nagy István', is not visible in this column. This indicates a data mismatch, as the correct lead is not displayed in its expected pipeline stage.

The screen should display a booking confirmation for a user named 'ZZ Nagy István'. The screenshot shows a booking confirmation step in Hungarian, which is correct. However, the user's name is not displayed anywhere on the screen. Instead, only an email address is shown in the user details section. The absence of the user's name is a bug, likely due to a failure to pass the name data to this view.

The user expected to see a card for a lead named 'Nagy István' with its outcome buttons visible. The screenshot shows a Kanban board with several lead cards, including one for 'ZZ S17 Nagy Sándor'. This card is expanded and clearly displays several outcome buttons at the bottom, such as 'Send + Booking FUP' and 'Reply & Mark Lost'. The name on the card does not match the expectation, but this is because 'ZZ' names are used as test sentinels according to project conventions. The core functional expectation that the buttons are visible is met, making the user's specific name expectation incorrect for this test context.

The user expected to see a 'noshow_rebook preview modal' showing 6 email steps for a lead named S9. However, the screenshot displays a 'Schedule a call' modal for creating a single calendar event. This modal is not a preview of an email sequence and does not show multiple steps. The context also appears to be for a different lead, 'ZZ S17 Nagy Sándor', not S9. This indicates that the wrong modal or feature was triggered by the user's action.

The user expected to see a task board with a card for 'Nagy István' in a 'Booking FUP' column, distinguished by a dashed border. However, the screenshot shows a different state of the application, with a 'Schedule a call' modal open in the foreground. The visible cards are for different people, and none of them have a dashed border. Furthermore, there is no column labeled 'Booking FUP' visible on the screen. The provided screenshot does not match the test case description at all, indicating a mismatch in the test setup.

The user expected to see the task board after a lead named 'Nagy István' was marked as lost, which should have moved or removed the card. However, the screenshot shows a 'Schedule a call' modal open for a different lead, 'ZZ S18 Kiss Tamás'. The lead's name, the action being performed, and the overall state of the UI are completely different from what was described. The provided expectation does not correspond to the content of the screenshot at all. The screenshot shows a valid UI state for scheduling a call, but it is not the state described in the test case.

The user expected to see a card for a lead named 'ZZ Szabó Péter' in the 'New Lead' column. However, the screenshot displays the 'New Lead' column with cards for 'ZZ S22 Molnár Zoltán' and 'ZZ S21 Horváth Béla'. The expected card for 'ZZ Szabó Péter' is not visible in this column or anywhere else on the screen. This discrepancy suggests a potential data filtering or state management issue where the correct lead is not being displayed in its designated pipeline stage. The absence of the expected lead card is a functional bug.

The user expected to see a booking widget personalized for a lead named 'ZZ Szabó Péter'. The screenshot displays a booking widget with Hungarian text and a time slot selector. However, the widget is not personalized and does not mention the lead's name anywhere on the page. The title and description are generic, which suggests a failure to inject the lead's data into the template. This is a bug because the personalization feature is not working as intended.

The user expected to see a booking confirmation page for 'ZZ Szabó Péter', indicated by a checkmark, the appointment date, and a Google Meet link. Instead, the screenshot displays the booking form itself, not a confirmation. The primary button shows the text 'Foglalás...', which means 'Booking...', indicating an in-progress or loading state. The expected confirmation elements like the checkmark and the Meet link are completely absent. This suggests the booking process has either stalled or failed, preventing the user from reaching the confirmation screen.

The user expected to see a card for 'ZZ Szabó Péter' in the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column. The screenshot displays a task board with several columns, including the one specified. In the 'BOOKED / SALES CALL PREP' column, the top card is indeed for 'ZZ Szabó Péter'. A modal window is also present, which details a new booking for this same person, further confirming the state. As the visual evidence perfectly matches the expectation, the screen passes.

The user expected to see the card for 'Szabó Péter' displaying a set of outcome buttons. These buttons should include 'Move Forward', 'No show + reschedule', 'No show + no answer → rebook seq.', and 'Mark Lost'. The screenshot shows a card for 'ZZ Szabó Péter' in the 'SALES CALL / PROPOSAL' column. This card clearly displays all the expected outcome buttons under the 'OUTCOME' heading. Since the visible elements perfectly match the requirements, the screen passes inspection.

The user expected to see the first page of a post-call form for an attended call with a timing objection, containing fields for company, price, payment type, and notes. The screenshot does show the first page of a post-call form, with fields for price, payment plan, and various notes sections. However, there is no explicit field for 'company' visible in the form. Additionally, the form seems designed for a successful call where a proposal is being created, not specifically for a call that ended with a timing objection. Since the UI appears correct for a positive call outcome but mismatches the specific fields and context described, the provided expectation is likely incorrect.

The user expected to see a card for Szabó Péter in a parked or 'Halaszt' state, indicating a timing objection. This card was supposed to show a follow-up date or a staging indicator. However, the screenshot shows a large 'Post-call form' modal open for this lead instead. The expected card view is not visible, being completely obscured by the modal. This indicates a likely bug in the application's state management, presenting the wrong UI for the lead's current status.

The user expected to see a lead named 'ZZ Kiss Gábor' in the 'New Lead' column of the task board. The screenshot shows the task board with several columns, including 'New Lead'. However, the leads visible in the 'New Lead' column are 'ZZ S22 Molnár Zoltán' and 'ZZ S21 Horváth Béla'. The expected lead, 'ZZ Kiss Gábor', is not present in the column. This indicates that the application's current data state does not match the test's expectation, which is a test setup issue rather than a UI bug.

The screen is expected to show a booking confirmation step for a user named 'ZZ Kiss Gábor'. The actual screenshot displays a booking confirmation page, but the email address shown is 'matyas.sarudi00+zzs11@gmail.com'. The expected user's name, 'ZZ Kiss Gábor', is nowhere to be found on the screen. This suggests that the wrong user's data has been loaded into the booking widget. This is a data integrity bug where the incorrect user information is being presented.

The user expected to see a card for a lead named "Kiss Gábor" with call outcome buttons. The screenshot displays a pipeline view with several lead cards, including one for "ZZ Kovács Béla" in the "SALES CALL / PROPOSAL" stage. This card for "ZZ Kovács Béla" does indeed show the "Move Forward" and other call outcome buttons as expected. However, the specific lead "Kiss Gábor" is not visible anywhere on the screen. This is likely a data mismatch where the test environment contains different leads than the user anticipated, so the expectation about the specific name was incorrect.

The user expects to see the first page of the post-call form, which should include fields for company, price, and payment type. The screenshot shows a modal titled 'Post-call form' which is on step 1 of 3. The form contains fields for 'Discounted price (HUF)' and 'Payment plan', which match the expectation. However, there is no visible field for capturing the company name. The absence of the 'company' field constitutes a bug, as it was explicitly listed in the expected content.

The user expected to see a manual call scheduler popup for an S11 lead, or the main board showing a lead named Kiss Gábor. Instead, the screenshot displays a 'Post-call form' modal for a lead named 'ZZ Kovács Béla'. The underlying task board is visible but does not feature the expected lead or stage. The content and state shown in the screenshot do not match the provided description in any way. It appears the wrong screenshot was matched with this specific test expectation, as the UI itself seems to be functioning correctly.

The user expected to see the final result after scheduling a second discovery call, which should include a created meeting event and a card in the 'Booked' state. The screenshot instead shows a 'Post-call form' modal, which is an intermediate step for logging the outcome of a call. This form is used to summarize the conversation and decide on next actions, such as creating a proposal or a calendar invite. The form has not yet been submitted, so the final state described in the expectation has not been reached. The discrepancy lies not in a UI bug, but in the user expecting a final state while viewing an in-progress one.

The user expected to see a Kanban board with a card for a lead named 'ZZ Varga Anna' in the 'New Lead' column. The screenshot displays the 'New Lead' column, but it contains cards for 'ZZ S22 Molnár Zoltán' and 'ZZ S21 Horváth Béla'. The expected card for 'ZZ Varga Anna' is not visible anywhere in this column. This is likely a data filtering or loading bug, where the specific lead was not fetched or rendered correctly in its assigned stage. The absence of the expected lead card constitutes a clear deviation from the requirement.

The user expects to see a booking confirmation screen for a user named 'ZZ Varga Anna'. The screenshot actually shows the final step of the booking process, asking the user to confirm their appointment. The screen correctly shows the selected time and the email address associated with the booking. However, the name of the person making the booking, 'ZZ Varga Anna', is completely missing from this confirmation view. This is a significant bug as the user cannot verify they are booking under the correct name before finalizing the appointment.

The user expected to see a card for a lead named Varga Anna, which should include a 'Move Forward' button. The screenshot instead displays cards for test leads named 'ZZ Németh Krisztina' and 'ZZ Kovács Béla'. The first card for 'ZZ Németh Krisztina' does contain the expected 'Move Forward' button. The discrepancy is likely due to the test environment being populated with different test data than anticipated. Therefore, the UI is rendering correctly, but the user's expectation about the specific data was incorrect.

The user expected to see the first page of a post-call wizard, containing a form to capture the company name, agreed price, payment type, and notes. The screenshot shows a "Post-call form" modal which is indeed the first of three pages. This form includes fields for price and payment plan, as well as multiple text areas for notes, but it is missing a field for the company name. Instead, it has many other detailed fields like "Situation", "Problem/Solution" pairs, and "Goals". It is likely that the expectation was based on an outdated or simplified specification, and the current implementation is correct as the form is already associated with a specific lead.

The user expected to see the second step of the post-call wizard, displaying an AI-generated proposal preview. This preview should have been accompanied by buttons labeled 'Újragenerálás' and '+ mentés új verzióként'. Instead, the modal is stuck in a perpetual "Generating..." state, and the proposal content is not displayed. Furthermore, the action buttons below are incorrectly labeled in English as "Regenerate with AI" and "+ Save as new version". This indicates both a failure in the content generation process and a localization error.

The user expected to see page three of the post-call wizard, which should be a proposal-chase sequence editor. This page should contain email step cards, subject and body fields, and specific save and submit buttons. However, the screenshot actually displays page two of the wizard, titled 'Generated proposal preview'. This screen is for generating the initial proposal using AI prompts, not for editing the follow-up email sequence. The discrepancy arises because the provided screenshot is for a different step in the workflow than the one described in the expectation.

The user expected to see the main board after submitting a post-call form, with a card for 'ZZ Varga Anna' in a new stage and a dashed border. Instead, the screenshot shows a 'Post-call form' modal still open for a different lead, 'ZZ Németh Krisztina'. This modal is displaying a proposal preview, which is an intermediate step, not the final state of the board. The expected card for 'ZZ Varga Anna' is not visible, nor is any card with a dashed border. The application appears to be stuck in the form submission flow and has not progressed to the expected board view.

The user expected to see a lead named 'ZZ Fekete Zoltán' in the 'New Lead' column of the task board. The screenshot does show the task board with a 'New Lead' column. However, the leads visible in this column are 'ZZ S22 Molnár Zoltán' and 'ZZ S21 Horváth Béla'. The expected lead, 'ZZ Fekete Zoltán', is not present in the visible area. This suggests an issue with the test data or setup, as the application is correctly displaying other leads in that column.

The screen was expected to show a booking confirmation for a user named 'ZZ Fete Zoltán'. However, the screenshot actually displays the step just before confirmation, asking the user to confirm their selected time. The title is 'Foglalj időpontot...' (Book an appointment...) and there is a large blue button labeled 'Foglalás megerősítése' (Confirm booking). The expected user's name is not visible, and the page is clearly a prompt for action rather than a confirmation of a completed action. This indicates a bug where the application is showing the wrong step in the booking user flow.

The user expected to see the first page of the post-call wizard for a client named 'S13 (Fekete Zoltán)'. The screenshot does show the first page of a post-call form, as indicated by the '1/3' progress bar. However, the name in the modal title is 'ZZ Németh Krisztina', which does not match the expected client. This suggests the test was run against the wrong data or a different test client was selected. Since the UI itself appears to be rendering correctly for the data it received, this is a test setup issue, not a product bug.

The user expected to see the board state after generating a proposal for a lead named Fekete Zoltán. The screenshot actually displays a 'Post-call form' modal with a generated proposal preview. This modal is clearly for a lead named 'ZZ Németh Krisztina', as indicated by the modal title and the greeting within the proposal text. The name 'ZZ Németh Krisztina' follows the project's convention for test sentinel data, indicating this is expected test content. The mismatch is therefore not a bug in the UI, but rather an incorrect expectation from the user regarding the lead's name.

The user expected to see a board with a card for 'ZZ Fekete Zoltán' in a signed but unpaid state, with an 'abandoned cart' AI draft. The screenshot, however, shows a task board with different leads, specifically 'ZZ S17 Nagy Sándor' and 'ZZ S19 Kiss Tamás' in the 'NEGATIVE REPLIES' column. A modal is also open for a 'Post-call form' for yet another lead, 'ZZ Németh Krisztina'. The expected lead and the 'abandoned cart' scenario are completely absent from the view. This indicates a mismatch between the test case description and the provided screenshot, as the content is entirely different.

The user expected to see a pipeline board with the card for 'ZZ S14 Adamik Péter' in the 'NEW LEAD' column. The screenshot shows the pipeline board with several columns, including 'NEW LEAD'. The 'NEW LEAD' column contains multiple cards, and the card for 'ZZ S14 Adamik Péter' is visible at the bottom. Although the card is partially cut off, this is due to the column being scrollable and the card being at the bottom of the visible area. The screen correctly displays the card in the expected column, so it matches the expectation.

The user expected to see a card for 'ZZ S14 Adamik Péter' in a column named 'Sign FUP / Proposal Sent'. The provided screenshot shows a task board with different columns and different lead cards. The expected card and column are not visible anywhere on the screen. This indicates that the user is viewing a different state of the application or a different user's board than anticipated. Therefore, the expectation for what should be on the screen is incorrect, not that the screen itself is bugged.

The user expected to see a card for 'ZZ S14 Adamik Péter' in a column named 'Sign FUP / Proposal Sent'. The provided screenshot shows a task board with different columns and different lead cards. The expected card and column are not visible anywhere on the screen. This indicates that the user is viewing a different state of the application or a different user's board than anticipated. Therefore, the expectation for what should be on the screen is incorrect, not that the screen itself is bugged.

The user expected to see a card for 'ZZ S14 Adamik Péter' in a column named 'Sign FUP / Proposal Sent'. The provided screenshot shows a task board with different columns and different lead cards. The expected card and column are not visible anywhere on the screen. This indicates that the user is viewing a different state of the application or a different user's board than anticipated. Therefore, the expectation for what should be on the screen is incorrect, not that the screen itself is bugged.

The user expected to see the task board scrolled to the right, showing the 'SIGN FUP' or 'PROPOSAL SENT' columns containing the card for 'ZZ S14 Adamik Péter'. However, the screenshot displays the leftmost columns of the board, such as 'NEGATIVE REPLIES' and 'NEW LEAD'. The specific card for lead ZZ S14 is not visible in this view. The expected columns and card are presumably off-screen to the right, as this is a horizontally scrollable interface. The screenshot does not capture the correct portion of the UI to validate the expectation.

The user expected to see a card for 'ZZ S14 Adamik Péter' in a column named 'Sign FUP / Proposal Sent'. The provided screenshot shows a task board with different columns and different lead cards. The expected card and column are not visible anywhere on the screen. This indicates that the user is viewing a different state of the application or a different user's board than anticipated. Therefore, the expectation for what should be on the screen is incorrect, not that the screen itself is bugged.

The user expected to see a card for 'ZZ S14 Adamik Péter' in a column named 'Sign FUP / Proposal Sent'. The provided screenshot shows a task board with different columns and different lead cards. The expected card and column are not visible anywhere on the screen. This indicates that the user is viewing a different state of the application or a different user's board than anticipated. Therefore, the expectation for what should be on the screen is incorrect, not that the screen itself is bugged.

The user expected to see the task board scrolled to the right, showing the 'SIGN FUP' or 'PROPOSAL SENT' columns containing the card for 'ZZ S14 Adamik Péter'. However, the screenshot displays the leftmost columns of the board, such as 'NEGATIVE REPLIES' and 'NEW LEAD'. The specific card for lead ZZ S14 is not visible in this view. The expected columns and card are presumably off-screen to the right, as this is a horizontally scrollable interface. The screenshot does not capture the correct portion of the UI to validate the expectation.

The user expected to see a Kanban board with a specific card for 'ZZ S15 Balogh Attila' in the 'NEW LEAD' column. This card was also expected to contain a reply draft regarding a question about a proposal. However, the screenshot displays a Kanban board with several columns, but the 'ZZ S15 Balogh Attila' card is not present in any of the visible columns. The 'NEW LEAD' column instead contains cards for 'ZZ S22 Molnár Zoltán' and 'ZZ S21 Horváth Béla'. Since the UI itself appears functional and the discrepancy is purely in the data displayed, it is highly likely that the test expectation is outdated or incorrect for the current state of the application.

The user expected to see the task board with the 'NEW LEAD' column not containing the lead 'S14 ZZ Adamik Péter'. The board should also have the stage filter turned off or set to show all stages. The provided screenshot shows the task board with the 'STAGE' filter set to 'All'. The 'NEW LEAD' column is visible and does not contain the specified lead, showing other leads instead. Since the specified lead is absent from the column as expected and the filter is set correctly, the screen matches the user's description.

The user expected to see the task board with the 'NEW LEAD' column not containing the lead 'S14 ZZ Adamik Péter'. The board should also have the stage filter turned off or set to show all stages. The provided screenshot shows the task board with the 'STAGE' filter set to 'All'. The 'NEW LEAD' column is visible and does not contain the specified lead, showing other leads instead. Since the specified lead is absent from the column as expected and the filter is set correctly, the screen matches the user's description.

The user expected to see the task board with the 'NEW LEAD' column not containing the lead 'S14 ZZ Adamik Péter'. The board should also have the stage filter turned off or set to show all stages. The provided screenshot shows the task board with the 'STAGE' filter set to 'All'. The 'NEW LEAD' column is visible and does not contain the specified lead, showing other leads instead. Since the specified lead is absent from the column as expected and the filter is set correctly, the screen matches the user's description.